Trump Proposes Sweeping, Permanent Pause on Migration from ‘Third World Countries’

By Vaidant November 28, 2025
Alarm 2 Min Read
Copied
Featured

The political landscape in the United States has been shaken once more as President Donald Trump announced an unprecedented and deeply controversial plan to enact a “permanent pause” on migration from what he termed “all Third World countries.” The dramatic announcement, made via social media, follows a recent, tragic security incident near the White House, which regrettably involved the death of a National Guard member.

Speaking in the wake of the heart-breaking event, the President linked the tragedy directly to the nation’s immigration policies. His proposed measures are not merely a temporary tightening of borders but a fundamental restructuring of the country’s approach to human movement. This includes the termination of what he called “illegal admissions,” the removal of individuals not considered a “net asset” to the nation, and an end to all federal benefits for non-citizens. Most concerningly, he pledged to deport any foreign national deemed a security risk or “non-compatible with Western Civilisation,” a phrase that has immediately raised alarm bells amongst human rights and immigration advocates.

However, the policy remains shrouded in ambiguity. The White House has yet to provide specific details on the countries that would be affected by the use of the outdated and often derogatory term “Third World countries,” nor the precise legal mechanism for a “permanent pause.” This lack of clarity leaves millions of people seeking to emigrate, study, or reunite with family in the US – often from vulnerable nations – facing a future of profound uncertainty. The immediate aftermath has already seen the US Citizenship and Immigration Services indefinitely suspend all immigration requests involving Afghan nationals, reflecting the administration’s serious and immediate response to the issue.

President Trump’s latest declaration represents a seismic potential shift in global migration, moving the US towards an aggressively protectionist stance framed through the lens of national security. While the desire for enhanced citizen protection following a severe incident is certainly paramount, the sweeping nature of the proposal—targeting entire categories of nations with vague, exclusionary language—risks alienating international allies and deeply unsettling countless individuals seeking better lives, education, or safety. As the world awaits the details on how this drastic policy might be legally or practically implemented, the ensuing debate will centre on striking a balance between national security and the humanitarian principles the US has historically claimed to uphold.

Source: THE PIE NEWS

More Articles

error: Content is protected !!